The Sengers Family Pages here!

My story of my time in Germany WW2,


Click to return.

Please note: The emails hereunder are NOT XHTML compliant because of the nature of those emails

Firstly My Latest email after not getting a responese from IOM

From: Compensation for Forced Labour [compensation@iom.int]
Sent: Monday, 16 June 2003 11:05 PM
To: 'chris@sengers-au.com'
Subject: RE: IOM Claim Number 9999999(no changed)

Rejection of claim for Personal Injury
Status of claim for Slave or Forced Labour
IOM Claim Number 9999999(no changed) (please indicate this Claim Number in any correspondence with IOM)

                                                                                    

Dear  Mr. Sengers,

Thank you very much for contacting the International Organization for Migration (IOM) concerning the status of your claim for slave or forced labour under the German Forced Labour Compensation Programme.

Please note that all claims filed with IOM, be it in the categories slave or forced labour, personal injury or property loss, are processed separately and claimants will receive separate notifications on all claims submitted. This means that a negative decision on a claim for personal injury has no impact on the decision on or payment of a slave or forced labour claim. If a claimant indicated on a claim form that he/she suffered from other personal injury, IOM automatically considers this as a claim on which it has to decide and all claimants concerned will be notified.

Your claim for slave or forced labour is currently being processed. IOM is searching German archives in order to find additional evidence to support your claim.

As of June 2003 IOM has recommended for payment 50,000 former slave and forced labourers. These represent about 70% of the total number of eligible claimants estimated at 70,000. Priority is given to claims of victims who are still alive. Claims of heirs will be dealt with after the claims of victims have been resolved.

Please be assured that IOM is processing all claims as quickly as possible and is committed to complete the German Forced Labour Compensation Programme until the end of 2004. You will be notified in writing as soon as a decision on any other claim has been taken.

We greatly appreciate your patience and understanding.

Yours sincerely,

International Organization for Migration
German Forced Labour Compensation Programme
17 route des Morillons - C.P. 71
CH-1211 Genève 19, Switzerland
Hotline: +41.22.592.82.30
Fax:      +41.22.798.61.50
E-mail: compensation@iom.int
Internet: www.compensation-for-forced-labour.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sengers [mailto:mailbox@sengers-au.com]
Sent: Mon, June 16, 2003 4:06 AM
To: compensation@iom.int
Subject: FW: IOM Claim Number 9999999(no changed)


Hello there.

Some time ago I wrote you an email. (see hereunder)

Today I still have not heard anything about my concern or
whatever you would like to call it.

I have now placed a copy of your letter of rejection of my
claim together with my responses.

If you wish, you could view that at:

http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html

Also, there will be other sites on the Web that have
indicated that they will publish my story and make links to
my site.

I am still waiting for an answer from you.

Greetings,

Chris & Jo Sengers
mailto:chris@sengers-au.com
mailto:Jo@sengers-au.com

Visit the Sengers Family Tree since 1340,
the pages of my Claim for Compensation for
German Slave/Forced Labour 1945 including
copies of the pages of my 1945 diary of
that period at http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html
and for all other pages go to  http://www.sengers-au.com

************************************************************
***
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. If you
receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)
or not responsible for delivery of the email to the
addressee(s),  please disregard the contents of the
email, delete the email and notify the author immediately.

************************************************************
******


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sengers [mailto:mailbox@sengers-au.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 14:34
To: compensation@iom.int
Subject: IOM Claim Number 9999999(no changed)


Dear Sir/Madam,

Today I received your Notification Of Rejection.

The following has been forwarded, by Air Mail to the Appeals
Body (PIN)

Appeals Body (PIN)
2nd May 2003
P. O. Box 174
1211 Geneva 19
Switzerland

Re: IOM Claim Number 9999999(no changed)

Dear Sir or Madam,

Today I received your Notification of Rejection dated the 21
April 2003.

My first reaction was of total disbelieve that my claim was
rejected.
However, on further reading I realised that there must have
been a gross misunderstanding of what my claim was about or
that a gross error was made in classifying my claim.

My claim was NOT for personal injury, even if I have
suffered and am still suffering from the trauma of that
period of my life.

My claim was for SLAVE or FORCED LABOUR or, whichever way
you would like to call it.
By careful reading of the pages of my claim you would
certainly become aware of what and how my incarceration was
all about.

The last sentence of your Notice of Rejection states
clearly:

This decision relates only to the above-referenced claim for
personal injury, and not to claims for slave or forced
labour or for property loss.

This could offcourse mean that you still are considering my
claim for that reason, but if not, I hereby ask you reread
my claim plus the attachment enclosed with this letter and
reconsider your decision.

Awaiting your reply.

Christaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers
133 Windsor Street
Richmond  NSW  2753
Australia.






One Attachment.



2nd May 2003

Attachment to Appeal of:

Notification of Rejection of Claim 9999999(no changed) in the name of
Christiaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers, 133 Windsor Street
Richmond NSW Australia.

What a preposterous, incorrect and almost abusive way of
rejecting this claim by indicating that my claim was for
personal injury and therefore rejected.

If anyone really would have read my claim, and attachments
to that claim properly, how could they come to the
conclusion that my claim was for personal injury?

The claim I made, was in the spirit of what was stated at
the top of your questionnaire FLA 4, like:

" if you were deported to Germany or a Germany-occupied area
and were subjected to forced labour and were held in
extremely harsh living conditions "

Would anyone, reading my claim and attachment, think that I
was on holidays and/or being a volunteer?
Did they not read that I was held captive by armed SA
officers and that the others, and I were not sleeping in
comfort but at times in barracks without blankets and food?
That at times we were sleeping in the open fields in the
snow with only molten snow for quenching our thirst? No
water to wash clothing or ourselves?
That our guards shot anyone that strayed outside the set
parameters? That at times the dead were just left where they
were, no one allowed to bury them? That because of the lice
infestation on everything, body, cloth etc. I would have
chosen to become sick with Typhus Fever? That I would have
chosen to be left like a sack of potatoes at the gate of a
hospital and by luck being accepted by the nuns and cared
for? That I would have asked to receive the Last Holy Rites?
And in the end, that I was told that there were only 25
known survivors of the group of men of about 150? Would that
have been my free choice, to be a survivor of 1 out of 6?

Maybe it is so, the current authorities that do not want to
know about it all. Maybe the decision was made recklessly. I
wonder about whatever the reason you choose to reject my
claim. Maybe you think that the proof of my claim is
insufficient. I know it is only circumstantial, copies of
pages of my diary of 1945 but I am almost certain that, in
some countries, some people have been found guilty and got
live imprisonment or even the death penalty for less
circumstantial evidence than that I have produced. By the
way, I still am in the possession of that diary and it will
always be kept. Also it was the last diary I ever have
maintained after that. If you wish, you can authenticate the
diary with the proviso, that it does not leave my
possession.
I should have been as possessive about my D.P.Card,
Displaced Persons Card issued by the American Army and/or
Red Cross carrying the details etc. Unfortunately, I lost it
over the years.

What more can I say. Nothing. It will be revealing though if
this Compensation Programme is really genuine. Do not let me
doubt it.



C.J.G.Sengers









Chris & Jo Sengers
mailto:chris@sengers-au.com
mailto:Jo@sengers-au.com

Visit the Sengers Family Tree since 1340,
the pages of my Claim for Compensation for
German Slave/Forced Labour 1945 including
copies of the pages of my 1945 diary of
that period at http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html
and for all other pages go to  http://www.sengers-au.com

************************************************************
***
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. If you
receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)
or not responsible for delivery of the email to the
addressee(s),  please disregard the contents of the
email, delete the email and notify the author immediately.

************************************************************
******


And the responese from IOM on this email

ats

 

EMAIL RECEIVED 17th June 2003

 

 

Rejection of claim for Personal Injury
Status of claim for Slave or Forced Labour
IOM Claim Number  (please indicate this Claim Number in any correspondence with IOM)

Dear Mr. Sengers,

Thank you very much for contacting the International Organization for Migration (IOM) concerning the status of your claim for slave or forced labour under the German Forced Labour Compensation Programme.

Please note that all claims filed with IOM, be it in the categories slave or forced labour, personal injury or property loss, are processed separately and claimants will receive separate notifications on all claims submitted. This means that a negative decision on a claim for personal injury has no impact on the decision on or payment of a slave or forced labour claim. If a claimant indicated on a claim form that he/she suffered from other personal injury, IOM automatically considers this as a claim on which it has to decide and all claimants concerned will be notified.

Your claim for slave or forced labour is currently being processed. IOM is searching German archives in order to find additional evidence to support your claim.

As of June 2003 IOM has recommended for payment 50,000 former slave and forced labourers. These represent about 70% of the total number of eligible claimants estimated at 70,000. Priority is given to claims of victims who are still alive. Claims of heirs will be dealt with after the claims of victims have been resolved.

Please be assured that IOM is processing all claims as quickly as possible and is committed to complete the German Forced Labour Compensation Programme until the end of 2004. You will be notified in writing as soon as a decision on any other claim has been taken.

We greatly appreciate your patience and understanding.

Yours sincerely,

International Organization for Migration
German Forced Labour Compensation Programme
17 route des Morillons - C.P. 71
CH-1211 Genève 19, Switzerland
Hotline: +41.22.592.82.30
Fax: +41.22.798.61.50
E-mail: compensation@iom.int
Internet: www.compensation-for-forced-labour.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sengers [<mailto:mailbox@sengers-au.com>]
Sent: Mon, June 16, 2003 4:06 AM
To: compensation@iom.int
Subject: FW: IOM Claim Number *******

Hello there.

Some time ago I wrote you an email. (see hereunder)

Today I still have not heard anything about my concern or
whatever you would like to call it.

I have now placed a copy of your letter of rejection of my
claim together with my responses.

If you wish, you could view that at:

<http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html>

Also, there will be other sites on the Web that have
indicated that they will publish my story and make links to
my site.

I am still waiting for an answer from you.

Greetings,

Chris & Jo Sengers
<mailto:chris@sengers-au.com>
<mailto:Jo@sengers-au.com>

Visit the Sengers Family Tree since 1340,
the pages of my Claim for Compensation for
German Slave/Forced Labour 1945 including
copies of the pages of my 1945 diary of
that period at <http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html>
and for all other pages go to <http://www.sengers-au.com>

************************************************************
***
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. If you
receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)
or not responsible for delivery of the email to the
addressee(s), please disregard the contents of the
email, delete the email and notify the author immediately.

************************************************************
******

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Sengers [<mailto:mailbox@sengers-au.com>]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2003 14:34
To: compensation@iom.int
Subject: IOM Claim Number *******

Dear Sir/Madam,

Today I received your Notification Of Rejection.

The following has been forwarded, by Air Mail to the Appeals
Body (PIN)

Appeals Body (PIN)
2nd May 2003
P. O. Box 174
1211 Geneva 19
Switzerland

Re: IOM Claim Number *******

Dear Sir or Madam,

Today I received your Notification of Rejection dated the 21
April 2003.

My first reaction was of total disbelieve that my claim was
rejected.
However, on further reading I realised that there must have
been a gross misunderstanding of what my claim was about or
that a gross error was made in classifying my claim.

My claim was NOT for personal injury, even if I have
suffered and am still suffering from the trauma of that
period of my life.

My claim was for SLAVE or FORCED LABOUR or, whichever way
you would like to call it.
By careful reading of the pages of my claim you would
certainly become aware of what and how my incarceration was
all about.

The last sentence of your Notice of Rejection states
clearly:

This decision relates only to the above-referenced claim for
personal injury, and not to claims for slave or forced
labour or for property loss.

This could offcourse mean that you still are considering my
claim for that reason, but if not, I hereby ask you reread
my claim plus the attachment enclosed with this letter and
reconsider your decision.

Awaiting your reply.

Christaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers

NSW
Australia.






One Attachment.



2nd May 2003

Attachment to Appeal of:

Notification of Rejection of Claim ******* in the name of
Christiaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers,
NSW Australia.

What a preposterous, incorrect and almost abusive way of
rejecting this claim by indicating that my claim was for
personal injury and therefore rejected.

If anyone really would have read my claim, and attachments
to that claim properly, how could they come to the
conclusion that my claim was for personal injury?

The claim I made, was in the spirit of what was stated at
the top of your questionnaire FLA 4, like:

“if you were deported to Germany or a Germany-occupied area
and were subjected to forced labour and were held in
extremely harsh living conditions”

Would anyone, reading my claim and attachment, think that I
was on holidays and/or being a volunteer?
Did they not read that I was held captive by armed SA
officers and that the others, and I were not sleeping in
comfort but at times in barracks without blankets and food?
That at times we were sleeping in the open fields in the
snow with only molten snow for quenching our thirst? No
water to wash clothing or ourselves?
That our guards shot anyone that strayed outside the set
parameters? That at times the dead were just left where they
were, no one allowed to bury them? That because of the lice
infestation on everything, body, cloth etc. I would have
chosen to become sick with Typhus Fever? That I would have
chosen to be left like a sack of potatoes at the gate of a
hospital and by luck being accepted by the nuns and cared
for? That I would have asked to receive the Last Holy Rites?
And in the end, that I was told that there were only 25
known survivors of the group of men of about 150? Would that
have been my free choice, to be a survivor of 1 out of 6?

Maybe it is so, the current authorities that don’t want to
know about it all. Maybe the decision was made recklessly. I
wonder about whatever the reason you choose to reject my
claim. Maybe you think that the proof of my claim is
insufficient. I know it is only circumstantial, copies of
pages of my diary of 1945 but I am almost certain that, in
some countries, some people have been found guilty and got
live imprisonment or even the death penalty for less
circumstantial evidence than that I have produced. By the
way, I still am in the possession of that diary and it will
always be kept. Also it was the last diary I ever have
maintained after that. If you wish, you can authenticate the
diary with the proviso, that it does not leave my
possession.
I should have been as possessive about my D.P.Card,
Displaced Persons Card issued by the American Army and/or
Red Cross carrying the details etc. Unfortunately, I lost it
over the years.

What more can I say. Nothing. It will be revealing though if
this Compensation Programme is really genuine. Don’t let me
doubt it.



C.J.G.Sengers









Chris & Jo Sengers
<mailto:chris@sengers-au.com>
<mailto:Jo@sengers-au.com>

Visit the Sengers Family Tree since 1340,
the pages of my Claim for Compensation for
German Slave/Forced Labour 1945 including
copies of the pages of my 1945 diary of
that period at <http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html>
and for all other pages go to <http://www.sengers-au.com>

************************************************************
***
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended
solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. If you
receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)
or not responsible for delivery of the email to the
addressee(s), please disregard the contents of the
email, delete the email and notify the author immediately.

************************************************************
******

 


Rejection Letter from IOM page 1

IOM International Organization for Migration

IOM International Organization for Migration                                                

0IM Organisation Internationale pour les Migrations                                Compensation Programmme

0IM Organizacion Internacional para las Migraciones

                                                                                                21 April 2003

                                                                        I0M Claim Number:

105778 EN1 ‑PIN 2/3_1009 24

CHRISTIAAN JACOBUS GERARDUS SENGERS                                                *******

AUSTRALIA

                                Notification of Rejection

 

Other Personal Injury‑ Category 2 and 3

 

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) has carefully considered the above‑referenced claim for payments from funds of the German Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" in connection with other personal injuries within the meaning of Section 11, Paragraph 1, Sentence 5 of the German Law on the Creation of a Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future" (Foundation Law).

 

On the basis of the provisions of the Foundation Law and the resolutions by the Board of Trustees of the German Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future", according to which priority is given to certain groups of victims in granting payments, and on account of the Federal Foundation's limited funds, you unfortunately will be unable to receive any payment. Under Section 11, Paragraph 1, Sentence 5 of the Foundation Law, the following groups are eligible for priority treatment in awarding payments:

 

* victims of medical experiments

* people who, as children, were lodged in a home for children of forced labourers and as a result suffered severe damage to their health

* people whose children died in homes for the children of forced labourers.

 

The Foundation Law provides for a smaller payment to be made to people suffering extremely severe and severe damage to their health, which is dependent on whether funds are still available from the total amount (DM 50 million) after payments have been made to priority cases.

 

The Foundation Law provides for a total of DM 50 million for all the Partner Organisations for the compensation of other personal injuries. Following an examination of all the applications by the seven Partner Organisations, the Federal Foundation and the Partner Organisations have jointly established that the number of eligible persons who have priority is so large that the funds are already fully exhausted by payments to this group.

 

From the information on your application form, there was no indication that the injury you suffered is one of the above‑mentioned types of personal injury, which qualifies as a priority case.

 

]OM is aware that on account of the limited financial resources of the German Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future", some victims of acts of National Socialist injustice that involved a major infringement on their physical and psychological integrity and caused great suffering cannot be considered eligible for payment. We regret that on the basis of the legal provisions and the resolutions taken by the Board of Trustees of the German Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility and Future", we have to reject the above‑referenced claim for other personal injury.

 

I0M German Forced Labour Compensation Programme

Tel: +41.22.592 82 30 E‑mail: compensation @iom,int . Internet: http://www.compensation‑for‑forced‑labour.org


Rejection Letter from IOM page 2

You may lodge an appeal against this decision with the IOM Appeals Body

You may lodge an appeal against this decision with the IOM Appeals Body. It is important that you include the ]OM claim number stated above in your written request to appeal. Your request to appeal must be post‑marked at the latest by 30 July 2003 and mailed to:

 

Appeals Body (PIN)

P. 0. Box 174

1211 Geneva 19

Switzerland

 

Please note that there will be no reimbursement of any expenses incurred in filing an appeal.

 

No appeal is possible against the provision granting preferential treatment to the above‑mentioned group of victims in comparison with other groups of victims. This provision is laid down in the Foundation Law, which means that the IOM Appeals Body cannot change it. An appeal would only make sense if you could make a credible showing, with a detailed personal account and, if possible, supporting documents, that your case fulfils the conditions for eligibility for payment in connection with medical experiments or accommodation in a home for the children of forced labourers and damage to health suffered as a result, or in connection with the death of one's own child in a home for the children of forced labourers.

 

This decision relates only to the above‑referenced claim for personal injury, and not to claims for slave or forced labour or for property loss.

 

International Organization for Migration

German Forced Labour Compensation Programme

 

10M German Forced Labour Compensation Programme

Tel: +41.22.592 82 30 E‑mail: compensation@iom.int ‑ Internet: http://www.compensation‑for‑forced‑labour.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


My Appeal Letter page 1

Appeals Body (PIN)

Appeals Body (PIN)                                                                    2nd May 2003

P. O. Box 174

1211 Geneva 19

Switzerland

 

Re: IOM Claim Number *******

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Today I received your Notification of Rejection dated the 21 April 2003.

 

My first reaction was of total disbelieve that my claim was rejected.

However, on further reading I realised that there must have been a gross misunderstanding of what my claim was about or that a gross error was made in classifying my claim.

 

My claim was NOT for personal injury, even if I have suffered and am still suffering from the trauma of that period of my life.

 

My claim was for SLAVE or FORCED LABOUR or, whichever way you would like to call it.

By careful reading of the pages of my claim you would certainly become aware of what and how my incarceration was all about.

 

The last sentence of your Notice of Rejection states clearly:

 

This decision relates only to the above-referenced claim for personal injury, and not to claims for slave or forced labour or for property loss.

 

This could offcourse mean that you still are considering my claim for that reason, but if not, I hereby ask you reread my claim plus the attachment enclosed with this letter and reconsider your decision.

 

Awaiting your reply.

 

Christaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers

**** Street

****  NSW  2753

Australia.

 

 

 

 

 

 

One Attacment.

 


My Appeal Letter page 2

Attachment to Appeal of:

2nd May 2003

 

Attachment to Appeal of:

 

Notification of Rejection of Claim ******* in the name of

Christiaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers, NSW Australia.

 

What a preposterous, incorrect and almost abusive way of rejecting this claim by indicating that my claim was for personal injury and therefore rejected.

 

If anyone really would have read my claim, and attachments to that claim properly, how could they come to the conclusion that my claim was for personal injury?

 

The claim I made, was in the spirit of what was stated at the top of your questionnaire FLA 4, like:

 

“if you were deported to Germany or a Germany-occupied area and were subjected to forced labour and were held in extremely harsh living conditions”

 

Would anyone, reading my claim and attachment, think that I was on holidays and/or being a volunteer?

Did they not read that I was held captive by armed SA officers and that the others, and I were not sleeping in comfort but at times in barracks without blankets and food? That at times we were sleeping in the open fields in the snow with only molten snow for quenching our thirst? No water to wash clothing or ourselves?

That our guards shot anyone that strayed outside the set parameters? That at times the dead were just left where they were, no one allowed to bury them? That because of the lice infestation on everything, body, cloth etc. I would have chosen to become sick with Typhus Fever? That I would have chosen to be left like a sack of potatoes at the gate of a hospital and by luck being accepted by the nuns and cared for? That I would have asked to receive the Last Holy Rites? And in the end, that I was told that there were only 25 known survivors of the group of men of about 150? Would that have been my free choice, to be a survivor of 1 out of 6?

 

Maybe it is so, the current authorities that don’t want to know about it all. Maybe the decision was made recklessly. I wonder about whatever the reason you choose to reject my claim. Maybe you think that the proof of my claim is insufficient. I know it is only circumstantial, copies of pages of my diary of 1945 but I am almost certain that, in some countries, some people have been found guilty and got live imprisonment or even the death penalty for less circumstantial evidence than that I have produced. By the way, I still am in the possession of that diary and it will always be kept. Also it was the last diary I ever have maintained after that. If you wish, you can authenticate the diary with the proviso, that it does not leave my possession.

I should have been as possessive about my D.P.Card, Displaced Persons Card issued by the American Army and/or Red Cross carrying the details etc. Unfortunately, I lost it over the years.

 

What more can I say. Nothing. It will be revealing though if this Compensation Programme is really genuine. Don’t let me doubt it.

 

 

 

C.J.G.Sengers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


My follow-up e-mail

Dear Sir/Madam,

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Today I received your Notification Of Rejection.

 

The following has been forwarded, by Air Mail to the Appeals Body (PIN)

 

Appeals Body (PIN)                                                                    2nd May 2003

P. O. Box 174

1211 Geneva 19

Switzerland

 

Re: IOM Claim Number *******

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Today I received your Notification of Rejection dated the 21 April 2003.

 

My first reaction was of total disbelieve that my claim was rejected.

However, on further reading I realised that there must have been a gross misunderstanding of what my claim was about or that a gross error was made in classifying my claim.

 

My claim was NOT for personal injury, even if I have suffered and am still suffering from the trauma of that period of my life.

 

My claim was for SLAVE or FORCED LABOUR or, whichever way you would like to call it.

By careful reading of the pages of my claim you would certainly become aware of what and how my incarceration was all about.

 

The last sentence of your Notice of Rejection states clearly:

 

This decision relates only to the above-referenced claim for personal injury, and not to claims for slave or forced labour or for property loss.

 

This could offcourse mean that you still are considering my claim for that reason, but if not, I hereby ask you reread my claim plus the attachment enclosed with this letter and reconsider your decision.

 

Awaiting your reply.

 

Christaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers

  NSW  2753

Australia.

 

 

 

 

 

 

One Attachment.

 

 

 

2nd May 2003

 

Attachment to Appeal of:

 

Notification of Rejection of Claim ******* in the name of

Christiaan Jacobus Gerardus Sengers, NSW Australia.

 

What a preposterous, incorrect and almost abusive way of rejecting this claim by indicating that my claim was for personal injury and therefore rejected.

 

If anyone really would have read my claim, and attachments to that claim properly, how could they come to the conclusion that my claim was for personal injury?

 

The claim I made, was in the spirit of what was stated at the top of your questionnaire FLA 4, like:

 

“if you were deported to Germany or a Germany-occupied area and were subjected to forced labour and were held in extremely harsh living conditions”

 

Would anyone, reading my claim and attachment, think that I was on holidays and/or being a volunteer?

Did they not read that I was held captive by armed SA officers and that the others, and I were not sleeping in comfort but at times in barracks without blankets and food? That at times we were sleeping in the open fields in the snow with only molten snow for quenching our thirst? No water to wash clothing or ourselves?

That our guards shot anyone that strayed outside the set parameters? That at times the dead were just left where they were, no one allowed to bury them? That because of the lice infestation on everything, body, cloth etc. I would have chosen to become sick with Typhus Fever? That I would have chosen to be left like a sack of potatoes at the gate of a hospital and by luck being accepted by the nuns and cared for? That I would have asked to receive the Last Holy Rites? And in the end, that I was told that there were only 25 known survivors of the group of men of about 150? Would that have been my free choice, to be a survivor of 1 out of 6?

 

Maybe it is so, the current authorities that don’t want to know about it all. Maybe the decision was made recklessly. I wonder about whatever the reason you choose to reject my claim. Maybe you think that the proof of my claim is insufficient. I know it is only circumstantial, copies of pages of my diary of 1945 but I am almost certain that, in some countries, some people have been found guilty and got live imprisonment or even the death penalty for less circumstantial evidence than that I have produced. By the way, I still am in the possession of that diary and it will always be kept. Also it was the last diary I ever have maintained after that. If you wish, you can authenticate the diary with the proviso, that it does not leave my possession.

I should have been as possessive about my D.P.Card, Displaced Persons Card issued by the American Army and/or Red Cross carrying the details etc. Unfortunately, I lost it over the years.

 

What more can I say. Nothing. It will be revealing though if this Compensation Programme is really genuine. Don’t let me doubt it.

 

 

 

C.J.G.Sengers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chris & Jo Sengers

mailto:chris@sengers-au.com

mailto:Jo@sengers-au.com

 

Visit the Sengers Family Tree since 1340,

the pages of my Claim for Compensation for

German Slave/Forced Labour 1945 including

copies of the pages of my 1945 diary of

that period at http://www.sengers-au.com/Germany.html

and for all other pages go to  http://www.sengers-au.com

 

***************************************************************

PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

 

This email and any files transmitted with it are intended

solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain

information which is confidential or privileged. If you

receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)

or not responsible for delivery of the email to the

addressee(s),  please disregard the contents of the

email, delete the email and notify the author immediately.

 

******************************************************************

 


[ Go Back ]